In Orwell’s essay collection Dickens, Dali & Others, published in 1946, Orwell wrote a long
piece called “Charles Dickens.” It
contains some of my favorite observations about Dickens, many of them
concerning David Copperfield. What do you think of the following?
· “No one, at any rate no English writer, has
written better about childhood than Dickens…no novelist has shown the same
power of entering into the child’s point of view.” In referring to the early chapters of
Copperfield’s life with the Murdstones, he says, “Dickens has been able to
stand both inside and outside the child’s mind, in such a way that the same
scene can be wild burlesque or sinister reality, according to the age at which
one reads it.” I think this explains the
gloom I felt reading the first part of the novel, immediately after finishing Born Bright.
C. Nicole Mason’s true story showed a similar power of presenting
hard reality as a child would experience it.
·
According to Orwell, Dickens identifies himself
more with the middle class than with the proletariat: “In David Copperfield…the
class-issue does not seem to strike him as paramount. It is a law of Victorian novels that sexual
misdeeds must not go unpunished...but neither
Dickens, nor old Peggotty…seems to feel that Steerforth has added to his
offence by being the son of rich parents.”
How do you see Dickens on the class issue?
·
About Dickens’s style of writing, he asserts, “The
thing that cannot be imitated is his fertility of invention, which is invention
…of phrase and concrete details. The outstanding, unmistakable mark of Dickens’s
writing is the unnecessary detail.” He gives as an example a line from the Pickwick Papers: “…the family were at
dinner – baked shoulder of mutton and potatoes under it….” As Orwell notes, the reader doesn’t need to
know that the potatoes were under the mutton.
The detail is merely “…a florid little squiggle on the edge of the page;
only, it is by just these squiggles that the special Dickens atmosphere is
created.” Do you agree? Can you find ‘florid little squiggles’
anywhere in David Copperfield?
Dickens,
Dali & Others / George Orwell
Harcourt,
Brace & World, Inc., 1946
In the library at: 824
ORW
Indeed there is much unnecessary detail. I read it as padding his word count to increase his payments. Has anyone read a Reader's Digest edition? I suspect that much could be cut without hurting the story at all.
ReplyDelete